[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!

To: tv@obbard.com
Subject: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
From: Maurice Rickard <maurice@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:18:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <20010521062339.62476.qmail@web10007.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20010521062339.62476.qmail@web10007.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: tv@obbard.com
Sender: tv-owner@obbard.com

At 11:23 PM -0700 5/20/01, g grant wrote:

Seeing how I no longer listern to anything new

Do0d! There's so much good new stuff out there, believe it or not.But I'm not going to list it until I finish my Chicago show review.Or contact me for details. And prepare to be inundated by other listmembers, I'm sure.


--
Maurice Rickard
http://mauricerickard.com/
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
  - From: Jay Pontrelli <jaypontrelli@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
  - From: g grant <grntg@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
Next by Date: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
Previous by thread: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
Next by thread: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread