[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!

To: tv@obbard.com
Subject: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
From: Maurice Rickard <maurice@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:44:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <20010521161733.89740.qmail@web13201.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20010521161733.89740.qmail@web13201.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: tv@obbard.com
Sender: tv-owner@obbard.com

At 9:17 AM -0700 5/21/01, Jay Pontrelli wrote:


Maurice:

Based on the delay time, I am expecting the Sistene
Chapel of reviews.

Right now it's more like _Gravity's Rainbow_, but I'm aiming for _TheRecognitions_.


--
Maurice Rickard
http://mauricerickard.com/
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
  - From: Keith Allison <keith@marquee.demon.co.uk>

References:
- Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
  - From: Jay Pontrelli <jaypontrelli@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
Next by Date: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
Previous by thread: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
Next by thread: Re: (TV) Philip, there has to be a statute of limitations on responding to my posts!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread