[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (TV) (OT) Heylin's latest gets mixed reception



----- Original Message ----- From: "robin dunn" <rdunnrn@yahoo.com>
To: <tv@obbard.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:33 PM
Subject: RE: (TV) (OT) Heylin's latest gets mixed reception


--- Leo Casey <LeoCasey@comcast.net> wrote:
The Clash fare especially
badly in this history. ...Heylin wants us to be
aware that, in those vital
early days, the Clash were primadonnas and posers
and no more valid than
Sham 69."



at least the clash -- or at least their manager -- had
the sense to avoid donning swastikas.  of course,
before johnny thunders, sid, siouxie, the dead boys et
al picked that crap up, keith moon, david bowie and
brian jones -- those old rock and roll rotters -- had
all made use of nazi symbols.  small point maybe, but
something i give the clash credit for avoiding.  it's
an element within rock culture i have just never
understood.



I wonder how Marc Bolan explained the "seig heil" part of John's Children's sets to his parents? --------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"