Re: (TV) 2 cents on Rap/dissing Richard.

["SCOTT ALDRICH" <scott.aldrich@worldnet.att.net>]

beautifully put.

----------
>From: Eric Gregory <egregory@standard.com>
>To: "'tv@obbard.com'" <tv@obbard.com>
>Subject: RE: (TV) 2 cents on Rap/dissing Richard.
>Date: Mon, Jan 10, 2000, 1:52 PM
>

> i dig what yr saying in re: junkies & hell seems to be pretty honest with
> what junk did to his trajectory.
> & to be perfectly blunt, based on "go now" & "the voidoid", i'd say hell's
> an awfully mediocre novelist.
> & his poetry's only slightly better.
> however, as a rock & roller, he's the shit.
> great songs, great phrasing, great look.
> i don't need to go into the ramifications & importance of "style" in rock &
> roll (i'm a little sick of the postmodernist huffing & puffing that poses as
> rock crit these days), but hell had a look & he created it, lived it, sang
> it, made it his life.
> & the "look" was just as important to yr vaunted jazz scene (particularly
> bebop).
> the smack was an obnoxious & boring detour & perhaps it derailed hell for
> good, but i know that BLANK GENERATION, "don't die" & yeah, even DESTINY
> STREET, all contributed to what i am today & they sure as shit showed me
> that writers who were tired of the publishing/spoken word scene could make
> their words fucking explode.
>
> & from where i stand, verlaine needs a cat like hell to loosen his sphincter
> a bit.
> ______________________________________________
> Eric S. Gregory
> IVR Assistant
> egregory@standard.com
> (503) 321-8503
> ____________________________________________
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jpg [mailto:jpg@sirius.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 10:47 AM
> To: tv@obbard.com
> Subject: Re: (TV) 2 cents on Rap/dissing Richard.
>
>
> Perhaps I was a little closer to the scene.  Let me be blunt. I see no
> genius
> in being a junkie. The scene was riddled with junkie poseurs. In other words
> they were spending more time getting high than working on their art or
> craft.
> To this day I can't help but " see through" what others may consider art or
> genius. I believe there is some a world of difference between an artiste and
> an
> artist. Hell, Thunders, etc. were merely acting out. Had they really worked
> at
> their craft perhaps their art would have matured.
> Hell to me symbolizes more nostalgia.
> On the other hand I feel Verlaine is still growing.
>
> Eric Gregory wrote:
>
>> i think the "substance" obviously came in the words & maybe not so
> obviously
>> with his delivery.
>> i certainly don't begrudge you yr opinion.
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Eric S. Gregory
>> IVR Assistant
>> egregory@standard.com
>> (503) 321-8503
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jpg [mailto:jpg@sirius.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 8:56 AM
>> To: tv@obbard.com
>> Subject: Re: (TV) 2 cents on Rap/dissing Richard.
>>
>> With all due respect I did listen to him. Like you said he had style at
> the
>> expense of substance. But at some point there has to be substance.
>>
>> --------------
>> To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
>> To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"
>
> --------------
> To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
> To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"
> --------------
> To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
> To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"