[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (TV) Re: TV Digest V1 #844 / 'few' not meant literally
>What do you mean "few"? I mean,
Hey Nick, I don't want to make a big deal
out of this, but it seems like I've been
rubbing you the wrong way recently.
>>am I **one of the few** who was embarrassed
>>by the Live (Paris?) VU 're-union'
It was just a figure of speech--a semi-rhetorical
question ---not to be taken literally--a feeble
attempt at irony/sarcasm as I realized there
was a high likelihood that a great many on MM list
were also disappointed by this piece of junk.
I was just trying to stimulate some discussion.
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:27 AM
Subject: (TV) Re: TV Digest V1 #844
What do you mean "few"? I mean, yes, great that they did it before Sterling
Morrison died, but otherwise...it sounds like a bunch of old farts playing
overly clean, very processed equipment. Come on: "White Light/White Heat"
isn't supposed to sound that way. Bad enough Reed had to give us Rock 'n'
Roll Animal's rendition of "Sweet Jane" and "Rock 'n' Roll" years before;
this was just completely unnecessary.
To post: Mail email@example.com
To unsubscribe: Mail firstname.lastname@example.org with message "unsubscribe tv"