[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(TV) Television compared to duck
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Philip
P. Obbard <email@example.com> writes
After watching last night, I have a question for those of you who were
fortunate enough to see Television in their 1976-78 heydey. I've seen
Television four times now - once in 2001, twice in 2002, and last night. Every
time, I get the feeling that Billy, Fred, and Richard are deadly serious, but
that Tom is only half-serious, basically just playing along while everyone else
Never saw them in the 70s but at the recent show I've seen I have to
agree with you - I thought Richard Billy and Fred were working hard so
that Tom didn't have to, if you see what I mean. At the ATP gig in 2001
if they hadn't been working so well/hard it would have been a disaster
because Tom couldn't have held it together on his own. Certainly,
looking back at that gig he seemed to be along for the ride. The whole
thing makes me think of a swimming duck - it seems to be gliding
effortlessly along but under the surface there's a whole lot of
concerted work going on to keep it moving along so well. It's kind of
sad that most of the audience is watching Verlaine when most of the work
seems to be done elsewhere on stage.
Of course it's possible for Tom to be half-serious if the other three
are making the thing _work_ (which they do). Imagine what a fiasco it
would be if Billy appeared to get lost in the middle of their most
famous song. Don't you think it's a bit odd that Verlaine can forget the
lyric when just about everyone in the audience could step up on stage
and sing it word-perfect?
I've got a feeling there's something wilful in Tom V. that won't allow
him to do things 'properly'. As we've said before, this is probably why
he's seen as a 'cult figure' rather than, say, another Bowie.
"The Wonder - Tom Verlaine, Television & Stuff"
To post: Mail firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe: Mail email@example.com with message "unsubscribe tv"