[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (TV) Velvets a jam band?

To: tv@obbard.com
Subject: Re: (TV) Velvets a jam band?
From: Rex Broome <rexbroome@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:50:41 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ASmVxo1oI3+JDySn15NIWNrpqlhk/IX/26qxCyVZ5clJzAt9mbNWA7rCvXPXrtHiEPlf7TMvVIA31cf+hgkzd/AbNodyCJta/V3FXpFbLMeDDo2WdB4BoUVA4X4LbBOiN3CwRDyZSTrJooqyX9BnTYIFE+ByYwMXPHz9BIiQrfE=
In-reply-to: <200502041813.j14IDbIf001610@ms-smtp-02.rdc-nyc.rr.com>
References: <018101c50ae2$fd6ec970$152ba745@mario> <200502041813.j14IDbIf001610@ms-smtp-02.rdc-nyc.rr.com>
Reply-to: tv@obbard.com
Sender: tv-owner@obbard.com

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:13:37 -0500, Scott Simpson <SSimpson@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> But then again, the Velvets remain the standard bearer for what a band
> should be, so they can pretty much do whatever they want and call it
> whatever they want.

Hmm... well, the Velvets remain a model of what a band should achieve,
but I don't know if they're the ideal of what a band should *be*, what
with all the hating each other and drugs and fluctuating lineups and
such.

That said, if they're not the gold standard, who is, really?

-Rex
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (TV) Velvets a jam band?
  - From: "dave eisenstadt" <eisenstadt@adelphia.net>

References:
- Re: (TV) Concert "Intro" = a Didjeridu
  - From: "dave eisenstadt" <eisenstadt@adelphia.net>
- (TV) Velvets a jam band?
  - From: "Scott Simpson" <SSimpson@nyc.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Press / RE: (TV) Jamming?
Next by Date: (TV) TV Quote on Cole or Tribute cd?
Previous by thread: (TV) Velvets a jam band?
Next by thread: Re: (TV) Velvets a jam band?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread