[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (TV) conclusion on the TOM VERLAINE remaster...

To: <tv@obbard.com>
Subject: Re: (TV) conclusion on the TOM VERLAINE remaster...
From: "Dennis D" <dend@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:56:14 -0400
References: <B2D7C52AFC38D61181940004763B1B0A0CD25D@vntmail03.volpe.dot. gov> <20020923181417.8351.qmail@web11001.mail.yahoo.com> <DrRtwLAGv1j9EwmH@marquee.demon.co.uk> <000301c26413$23ddf460$6513893e@baka>
Reply-to: tv@obbard.com
Sender: tv-owner@obbard.com

I think I'd have bought it anyway, but it would have been nice to know what
mix I was buying.

> i agree with Keith, my guess is that Tom has insisted this mix go on
though
> i'd
> be pissed off as well mind if i'd bought this new version - i'll stick
> with the vinyl version i think thanks
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (TV) conclusion on the TOM VERLAINE remaster...
  - From: "Philip P. Obbard" <pobbard@yahoo.com>

References:
- RE: (TV) My conclusion on the TOM VERLAINE remaster...
  - From: "Philip P. Obbard" <pobbard@yahoo.com>
- Re: (TV) My conclusion on the TOM VERLAINE remaster...
  - From: Keith Allison <keith@marquee.demon.co.uk>
- (TV) conclusion on the TOM VERLAINE remaster...
  - From: "Raymond" <ray@wavewalker.freeserve.co.uk>

Prev by Date: (TV) conclusion on the TOM VERLAINE remaster...
Next by Date: Re: (TV) Mostly Off-topic but interesting article
Previous by thread: (TV) conclusion on the TOM VERLAINE remaster...
Next by thread: Re: (TV) conclusion on the TOM VERLAINE remaster...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread